首页> 外文OA文献 >E-QED: Electrical Bug Localization During Post-Silicon Validation Enabled by Quick Error Detection and Formal Methods
【2h】

E-QED: Electrical Bug Localization During Post-Silicon Validation Enabled by Quick Error Detection and Formal Methods

机译:E-QED:硅后验证期间的电子错误定位   通过快速错误检测和形式化方法启用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During post-silicon validation, manufactured integrated circuits areextensively tested in actual system environments to detect design bugs. Buglocalization involves identification of a bug trace (a sequence of inputs thatactivates and detects the bug) and a hardware design block where the bug islocated. Existing bug localization practices during post-silicon validation aremostly manual and ad hoc, and, hence, extremely expensive and time consuming.This is particularly true for subtle electrical bugs caused by unexpectedinteractions between a design and its electrical state. We present E-QED, a newapproach that automatically localizes electrical bugs during post-siliconvalidation. Our results on the OpenSPARC T2, an open-source500-million-transistor multicore chip design, demonstrate the effectiveness andpracticality of E-QED: starting with a failed post-silicon test, in a few hours(9 hours on average) we can automatically narrow the location of the bug to(the fan-in logic cone of) a handful of candidate flip-flops (18 flip-flops onaverage for a design with ~ 1 Million flip-flops) and also obtain thecorresponding bug trace. The area impact of E-QED is ~2.5%. In contrast,deter-mining this same information might take weeks (or even months) of mostlymanual work using traditional approaches.
机译:在硅后验证期间,已在实际系统环境中对制造的集成电路进行了广泛的测试,以检测设计错误。错误本地化涉及到错误跟踪(激活和检测错误的输入序列)和错误所在的硬件设计模块的标识。硅后验证期间的现有错误定位实践大多是手动和临时的,因此极其昂贵且耗时。对于由设计与其电气状态之间的意外交互所引起的细微电子错误,尤其如此。我们提出了E-QED,这是一种新方法,可在硅验证后自动定位电子错误。我们在OpenSPARC T2(一种开源5亿晶体管多核芯片设计)上的结果证明了E-QED的有效性和实用性:从失败的硅测试后开始,在几个小时内(平均9个小时),我们可以自动将错误的位置缩小到少数候选触发器(扇形逻辑锥)(对于具有约100万个触发器的设计,平均18个触发器),并获得相应的错误跟踪。 E-QED的面积影响约为2.5%。相反,使用传统方法确定相同的信息可能要花费数周(甚至数月)的大部分手动工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号